[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Protoscience and the scientific revolution
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] | [Date Next]
- Subject: Protoscience and the scientific revolution
- From: jrmu@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 21:05:46 -0700
- To: ircnow-offtopic@xxxxxxxxxx
- Cc: mkf@xxxxxxxxxx
Greetings, Four (possibly five) civilizations participated in the axial age with protoscientific philosophy: the Greeks, the Chinese, the Indians, the Arab/Persians, and possibly the Mayans/Aztecs/Incans These have been termed "axial civilizations" because they developed the seeds of science, although not science itself. They instead laid its foundations because of the questions they asked about how and what we know about knowledge. The Europeans were the first civilization to successfully take protoscience and turn it into advanced science during the 1600s-1800s. They advanced so far that other civilizations abandoned their own traditions and copied European science wholesale. As a result, today all science is based on questions originating from ancient Greek philosophies, and almost none from the other civilizations. There is, however, value in reexamining the protosciences of other ancient civilizations. These could potentially blossom into alternative universes of science. Imagine the cultivation of a fruit tree from seed. Each protoscientific tradition represents seeds of different species. Perhaps Greece is an apple seed, China an orange seed, India a guava seed, and so on. Apples were cultivated to great success, but the other seeds did not bear fruit because of a lack of fertilizer, water, and good soil. Economic and political conditions in other civilizations did not allow the development of advanced science. Yet because the seeds are fundamentally different species, the proper cultivation may result in the blossoming of unique fruits. These may turn into alternative sciences. -- Aaron Lin jrmu@xxxxxxxxxx IRCNow (https://ircnow.org)